1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Debate

  • Re: Charlie Kirk Murdered

    From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Friday, November 07, 2025 11:31:18
    Dumas Walker wrote to JIMMYLOGAN <=-

    In Genisis 9:12-17, God amends this promise to never destroying all living things *by flood* again. This is also the section where the rainbow is first used as a sign of this covenant.

    "all" things by "flood", sounds like His attorney wrote in some
    loopholes... :)

    Genesis, and the four books that followed, are considered "The Books of
    Law," after all. :D


    * SLMR 2.1a * Whips & chains? Sorry, that's a hardware problem!
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANTIR to jimmylogan on Monday, November 10, 2025 06:31:33
    Re: Re: Charlie Kirk Murdered
    By: jimmylogan to Dumas Walker on Fri Oct 31 2025 07:24 pm

    Okay - let me be a little more direct. If someone 'supposedly' shares
    your belief but you think they would ruin things, do they really
    share your beliefs?

    In other words, if someone shares your beliefs about transgender,
    that there is only two genders, would you support them? Because
    if you believe that's not positive for the country as a whole,
    then do you really have that belief to begin with?


    That is an easy answer. The fact I agree with somebody does not mean he is apt for a position. I might support his ideas but think he is not a good candidate because he is incompetent.


    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From jimmylogan@VERT/DIGDIST to Arelor on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 07:45:42
    Arelor wrote to jimmylogan <=-


    That is an easy answer. The fact I agree with somebody does not mean he
    is apt for a position. I might support his ideas but think he is not a good candidate because he is incompetent.

    Okay - so if two candidates are both competent and capable, would you
    vote for the one that shares your beliefs or not?



    ... Please hold... All our Taglines are busy at the moment.
    --- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANTIR to jimmylogan on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 20:43:05
    Re: Re: Charlie Kirk Murdered
    By: jimmylogan to Arelor on Wed Nov 19 2025 07:45 am

    Okay - so if two candidates are both competent and capable, would you
    vote for the one that shares your beliefs or not?


    Yeah, if there was such a thing as a competent and capable candidate who shared my ideas, I would endorse him before others.


    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to ARELOR on Thursday, November 20, 2025 13:54:46
    Okay - so if two candidates are both competent and capable, would you
    vote for the one that shares your beliefs or not?

    Yeah, if there was such a thing as a competent and capable candidate who share
    my ideas, I would endorse him before others.


    In the US, we've got real good at nominating persons who are questionable
    in both categories for at least the last 3 Presidential elections. There
    are many Americans who think it is OK to nominate/elect a real turd so long
    as it pisses the "other side" off, or so long as that turd "checks a box."

    For at least a few, pissing the other side off is the only qualification necessary. For more than that, checking a box is the only, or most
    important, qualification.


    * SLMR 2.1a * I'm heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP